December 19, 2014

Morning Musings on Being an Introvert

I'm Not going to my ceramics class today for the potluck and show & tell. Julie called me a "party pooper".  Yes, I can be. I hardly know these people. I have no desire to be critiqued by strangers...or anyone else.  I have no desire to be looked at or seen today.


Every day we put ourselves "out there"...to the public, to strangers..and Facebook is not any different.  How many ways do we show who we are?


I'm an introvert, but most people would never know it...I try to hide it, and at times I end up hiding myself.  I hide behind jest and jokes; I hide behind faces and masks; I hide in the stories I write and tell, in the landscapes and art forms, in my metaphor.


I'm an introvert who wants to be seen but not critiqued, now that I'm in my latter years of my life.  I've had my day in the sun and my fifteen minutes of fame...I've shown and I've told about myself for so many years, it's now tiring for me to enter into these "conversations".


Last night I was "up", the extrovert, preparing for today to talk to the class about ceramics, my art.  
This morning I am "down", the introvert, wanting to stay in bed, write, drink my coffee, be alone.


To find a happy "middle ground" or "medium" is always a challenge...a balancing act...it’s an art...a tightrope walk...a tiring challenge because in plain and simple words, it's work.


We talk about creativity.  I've written many lines about what that word means to me.  For years it's been a topic of my discussions, and the discussion is never ending. Because no two people read alike, think alike, listen alike, see alike...or dream alike; no two discussions will sound alike.  


It's been a more than interesting ride, but I no longer feel the need for the challenge of holding on tirelessly.  My ideas and mind are close to being spent, no longer keeping "up" to and for the challenge.  


I'm tired today.  Yesterday, the people exhausted me... Ants running around helter-skelter, all knowing which way they wanted to go, and all independently crossing my path to obstruct my forward flow...Life is an obstacle for an introvert, where “flow” is all important to being creative.

November 16, 2014

Erasing Prejudice


In being asked to say a few words about why history on the subject of LGBTQ is important in the educational system and why this subject should be taken seriously, here are my answers.

 
My thoughts on the subject directed me towards a young woman and new hero, Malala Yousafzai, a recent Nobel Peace Prize winner, and her strong and forthright voice for the advocacy of education for everyone.  But my feelings didn't stop there….to not just education “for everyone”, but “about everyone”, too, which led me to thinking about the pros and cons of the strength of teaching the truths.  Malala found out just how those truths can be twisted if held by deadly hands.


Prejudice is the corrupter of all truths, and prevents the emergence of most subjects controversial, leaving myths to perpetuate, and leading to the withholding of vital information regarding the much needed voice of the LGBT community in the education of all.


I believe the destructive and deadly stranglehold by those voices of suppression is real and alive now through lies, distortions and corruption, and has brought about a real need to talk, read, write and disclose all things possible in our education of young impressionable minds….we need to bring about a real change for truth, and start standing up to the bullies who squelch these truths with their hatred.


I am the mother of two adult daughters, and just because one is gay doesn’t change my feelings of equal love and understanding for both. I've chosen to further educate myself on this subject. Opening up one’s mind to everyone’s differences allows us to accept our own differences; no two people are the same.  The bottom line is understanding leads to acceptance.  


We teach equality in the schools, “not to bully” or mistreat, but do we teach the history behind those reasons?...and the dangerous journey by which withholding rights can lead to these struggles of today?  


History begins now - understanding the past as to be able to send a positive look and attitude towards the future.  Educate by showing not just the hardships, but the accomplishments of all people.  Clear the air of hate and mistrust,  the common denominators to prejudice.


November 08, 2014

Book Review - Maplecroft by Cherie Priest

I stayed up most of the night, partly due to reading Maplecroft, a more than 'weird' account of Lizzy Borden, a fictitious fantasy story by Cherie Priest, and partly due to the recounting this story in my head, causing my tossing and turning.  The details of each chapter's/character's account is to the point of tiresome, and I’m only on page 68 of 435...haven't got a clue where this tale is leading...mysteries of the walking dead?...of all the far fetched mysteries!!

I'm researching the facts, just out of curiosity. I've read a couple of Priest's Steampunk novels, which I enjoyed, but in THIS novel her word usage and sentence structure is very different...she literally immerses herself into a Victorian period of place and character.


Maplecroft does have a few of the facts thrown into the story, attaching this family/murder to give it its base...not a lot of facts were gathered from that period of the century, so embellishment is left to this author’s discretion. I simply can't get over Priest’s writing style, it is so period - late 1800's - and with a Jane Austen flare to boot...but no matter how interesting the story, it still tends to sink me into the mire of tedious verbiage---I’m not an Austen fan---so I tend to skim and read fast...which isn't my norm.

To my dismay, I had to shut the pages on Cherie Priest's novel, Maplecroft...175 pages in. I gave it everything I could muster to try and read this book....Pure fantasy inhabited Priest's Lizzy Borden story with oozing slime and gore, topped off with horrific putrid odors repeatedly revealed to the reader--Revolting to the 'enth degree! Then add tedium to the over all murky redundancy - Character chapter after character chapter after character chapter, with each character recounting the same tiresome tale aud nauseum.  

I'll be forthright, I didn't know what direction Priest would take this story, but I was open to finding out.  Well...I found out, and that was enough for my sensitive disposition.


November 06, 2014

My Thoughts on The Essence of Poetry

‎ 05-05-2010 - 9:02 a.m.
In thinking about the 'sweet and low' aspects of poetry, which appears to be captured in most lyrics that have to do with this subject, the tug-of-war of love,  I was thinking about the music behind those words.  
I watch American Idol, and see these mentors giving advice to young people who love to sing.  "It's in the words", they tell them...."feel the words", is their advice, although this point is argued at times.  With the mentor Harry Connick Jr, he said to one guy, “It can be just the music that moves you, let it happen”.
As a novice to writing poetry, most of what I write just happens with feeling an emotion at that moment, and can happen within a split second.  Something triggers it.....It can sustain itself, or go away just as it happens.
It can be music that gives me a beat in my head, nothing to do with the words that accompany any particular song....my feelings always seem to echo some kind of beat, whether it's in my head or in my heart, and that's why I think reading lyrics can be a lot more difficult to read as poetry, unless there is music to accompany them.  
Emphasis on the beat, emphasis on the note, or the rising or lowering of the sounds of an instrument attached to that word.   It feels like a heartbeat.  There are all different tonalities of voices, and when these words are written they have to reflect a voice. As Harry said, he wanted to know the hidden meaning within the words of the song that Crystal was singing, what it meant to her, without her actually telling him who she was singing about, or for, he wanted to hear those beats, those tones.
Poetry seems to be all sorts of things to all sorts of people, and interpreting those meanings can be precarious at times.  We don't always know what's in the heart or the mind of the person who writes them. We can guess, or feel what we want, or compelled to feel. 
With music, I can let that lead me to the meaning of words. It's glorious to feel those high notes and have them sustained - and it can be sweet to feel those low notes, but at the same time they can break your heart in the process.

September 25, 2014

Book Review: Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage by Haruki Murakami

Haruki Murakami has to be one of my favorite writers and storytellers of all time, but I'm only giving this particular book three stars out of five, which is simply a "Good"; leaving me saddened, in my own personal feelings during my reading; saddened for the main character's feelings; and saddened in the overall writing of this story. 

The boredom I continually felt, fought with my knowledge of my wanting to find something worth salvaging from this story. There were interjections of words of wisdom, but confused them in the mix of sexual meaningless. 

I wanted to feel each point of the story, to connect them to other points of the story, but it blasaily continued on, and on, leaving me feeling cheated in small disconnected ways, and then watching the main character, Tsukuru Tazaki, sit endlessly watching trains go by, time after time,was equivalent to watching paint dry. 

For the life of me, I can't stand it when a writer has a character "biting her lip", on multiple occasions no less, until I want to "swoon" in dismay!  Why do writers like Murakami stoop to an Austenesque melodrama? 


I felt as if I were dropped in the midst of a Murakami personal journal, not good, not bad, just "lacklusterly" there and resigned.  I think “lackluster” pretty much covers it in a word.  

Yes, writers can leave endings to the reader’s own imagination, but my imagination was split right down the middle, almost hoping Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki would simply die in the end from one of his “shooting pains to the heart”.  Yes, again, this main character depressed me to that point.., but instead Tazaki fades away into his colorless unconsciousness...  Was there hope for him in the end?  Only Murakami can answer that..

It saddens me to have to say these negative things about this novel, but that's how it left me feeling, saddened to my core.


September 06, 2014

Book Review - A Life of One's Own by Ilana Simons



Rarely do we get a chance to enter the little known world of an author’s most private thoughts. We read their stories and we see their character’s visions through their voice. Plots are seamlessly developed along the way, blending the climactic concordance of these elements. But with this said, I hear a voice in which I have never heard before, by this author, Ilana Simons. She gives a personal account of another author, one who had fought to give her own voice to the world.

Virginia Woolf becomes not just the central character to Ilana’s story, but the narrator of this new author’s dreams and visions. We see the many lives of Woolf, translated into a wealth of intertwining plots.

There was not a single word unsaid, gathering us in, together and around this captivating tribute to a woman to reckon with. Ilana has come to it with force and with beauty, showing us Virginia, a woman who wanted to be everything in life, but only after death, soared and became.

Ilana gives us a rare and intimate voice, in the telling of Woolf’s life challenges, in turn applying them within her own life, then relating it into ours. This wisdom for us is unique, and graces each page she writes. Hard facts and ideas are folding and blending with soft personal thoughts within Virginia’s thoughts, seeking and showing the feelings to which we can all identify.

Virginia strived to relate to her everyday existence, an existence in which she fought her entire life to maintain with balance, while dealing with an illness that brought her life to an all too soon end.

It is, indeed, a rare voice we hear within this book; Ilana showing us what desires can be fulfilled through Virginia’s wisdom, and works Virginia had fought to put in print; Ilana has given to us her own voice in print, straight to our ears, touching our own desires for a better life.

There is no perfect self, or a perfect world, but with Ilana Simons’ tender words, they translate Virginia Woolf’s heart to your heart. You will not come away hungry after reading this book, unless it is a hunger for life.



August 12, 2014

In memory of Robin Williams

I find it a sad day, today, remembering Robin Williams. What could have been done to reverse this outcome....

Reading article after article and watching him laugh, watching his audience laugh... his manic and hilarious monologues where he captures the humor in everything he saw; an article where he sat with his daughter, Zelda, discussing her name, there was poignant meaning, the seriousness and the laughter. 

He was the one person who could see inside of himself where sadness was hidden. The sadness I see today is for those who can't see where he reached inside to twist that sadness, time after time, into something that could make people laugh. His humor gave him away.

For those who think that suicide is a selfish act. Let me explain, selfishness has nothing to do with this act of taking your own life. There is a wall that goes up inside the brain that blocks out the world to a point where the pain is so great that the only way to relieve that pain is to stop it by taking that life away, yours. 

It's not a pain that can be glossed over with "getting out in the sunshine, taking a pill, going to the movies, change of scenery", because you're stopped dead in your tracks when depression hits. As with manic depressive personalities, it's just what it indicates, one minute your mind is as free as a bird, the next it's kept in a cage. The medications, which varies with everyone, only works if the support mechanisms, doctors and therapists, loved ones, the systems around you are in force to help it work.

In conclusion, be aware of your friends and the people around you. Listen to them. Support them.

August 06, 2014

Peace at What Price?


I begin to wonder if there is any price tag for peace.  
Warring never ends, and it would seem as though nations will never have any intentions of ending their wars.  Hate, fear….How many dead do we have to bury before we realize these are flesh and blood, living, breathing human beings we have killed to satisfy the selfish ego?
Disagreement  
Do we learn?  What is learned?   Do we want to learn what it means to have peace in our lives?  
Controversy
Where and why does force overrule thought?
Blame
Fixing blame and not letting go, nor letting go long enough to reason.
Open your minds long enough to sit down and
Talk
Learn
reason
Compromise
Care
Love
At what price do we put on love, something that was given to us freely to use?  No cost to love
No human sacrifice to give for love
No more blood to let flow down the streets of hate
No more hate out of fear
free’ly, plainly and simply to Love

No Price for Peace

July 27, 2014

What Christians Don’t Know About Israel

The following is an essay by American Journalist and Author, Grace Halsell.  It plays a more than important part in what’s happening in the world today, these fourteen years after her death.

I believe what she has to say is worth listening to, and whether you believe what she has written is true or not, it’s time to look back on our world history and make up your own mind.  Our prejudices are far deeper than skin deep.

You are here  http://www.ihr.org/
   What Christians Don't Know About Israel
  
 By Grace Halsell
   American Jews sympathetic to Israel dominate key positions in all areas of our government where decisions are made regarding the Middle East. This being the case, is there any hope of ever changing U.S. policy? American Presidents as well as most members of Congress support Israel -- and they know why. U.S. Jews sympathetic to Israel donate lavishly to their campaign coffers.
The answer to achieving an even-handed Middle East policy might lie elsewhere -- among those who support Israel but don't really know why. This group is the vast majority of Americans. They are well-meaning, fair-minded Christians who feel bonded to Israel -- and Zionism -- often from atavistic feelings, in some cases dating from childhood.
I am one of those. I grew up listening to stories of a mystical, allegorical, spiritual Israel. This was before a modern political entity with the same name appeared on our maps. I attended Sunday School and watched an instructor draw down window- type shades to show maps of the Holy Land. I imbibed stories of a Good and Chosen people who fought against their Bad "unChosen” enemies.
In my early 20s, I began traveling the world, earning my living as a writer. I came to the subject of the Middle East rather late in my career. I was sadly lacking in knowledge regarding the area. About all I knew was what I had learned in Sunday School.
And typical of many U.S. Christians, I somehow considered a modern state created in 1948 as a homeland for Jews persecuted under the Nazis as a replica of the spiritual, mystical Israel I heard about as a child. When in 1979 I initially went to Jerusalem, I planned to write about the three great monotheistic religions and leave out politics. “Not write about politics?” scoffed one Palestinian, smoking a waterpipe in the Old Walled City. “We eat politics, morning, noon and night!”
As I would learn, the politics is about land, and the co-claimants to that land: the indigenous Palestinians who have lived there for 2,000 years and the Jews who started arriving in large numbers after the Second World War. By living among Israeli Jews as well as Palestinian Christians and Muslims, I saw, heard, smelled, experienced the police state tactics Israelis use against Palestinians.
My research led to a book entitled Journey to Jerusalem. My journey not only was enlightening to me as regards Israel, but also I came to a deeper, and sadder, understanding of my own country. I say sadder understanding because I began to see that, in Middle East politics, we the people are not making the decisions, but rather that supporters of Israel are doing so. And typical of most Americans, I tended to think the U.S. media was “free” to print news impartially.
'It shouldn't be published. It's anti-Israel.'
In the late 1970s, when I first went to Jerusalem, I was unaware that editors could and would classify "news" depending on who was doing what to whom. On my initial visit to Israel-Palestine, I had interviewed dozens of young Palestinian men. About one in four related stories of torture.
Israeli police had come in the night, dragged them from their beds and placed hoods over their heads. Then in jails the Israelis had kept them in isolation, besieged them with loud, incessant noises, hung them upside down and had sadistically mutilated their genitals. I had not read such stories in the U.S. media. Wasn't it news? Obviously, I naively thought, U.S. editors simply didn't know it was happening.
On a trip to Washington, DC, I hand-delivered a letter to Frank Mankiewicz, then head of the public radio station WETA. I explained I had taped interviews with Palestinians who had been brutally tortured. And I'd make them available to him. I got no reply. I made several phone calls. Eventually I was put through to a public relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who said my letter had been lost. I wrote again. In time I began to realize what I hadn't known: had it been Jews who were strung up and tortured, it would be news. But interviews with tortured Arabs were “lost" at WETA.
The process of getting my book Journey to Jerusalem published also was a learning experience. Bill Griffin, who signed a contract with me on behalf of MacMillan Publishing Company, was a former Roman Catholic priest. He assured me that no one other than himself would edit the book. As I researched the book, making several trips to Israel and Palestine, I met frequently with Griffin, showing him sample chapters. “Terrific,” he said of my material.
The day the book was scheduled to be published, I went to visit MacMillan's. Checking in at a reception desk, I spotted Griffin across a room, cleaning out his desk. His secretary Margie came to greet me. In tears, she whispered for me to meet her in the ladies room. When we were alone, she confided, "He's been fired.” She indicated it was because he had signed a contract for a book that was sympathetic to Palestinians. Griffin, she said, had no time to see me.
Later, I met with another MacMillan official, William Curry. “I was told to take your manuscript to the Israeli Embassy, to let them read it for mistakes,” he told me. “They were not pleased. They asked me, “You are not going to publish this book, are you?” I asked, "Were there mistakes?” “Not mistakes as such. But it shouldn't be published. It's anti-Israel.”
Somehow, despite obstacles to prevent it, the presses had started rolling. After its publication in 1980, I was invited to speak in a number of churches. Christians generally reacted with disbelief. Back then, there was little or no coverage of Israeli land confiscation, demolition of Palestinian homes, wan ton arrests and torture of Palestinian civilians.
The Same Question
Speaking of these injustices, I invariably heard the same question, “How come I didn't know this?" Or someone might ask, "But I haven't read about that in my newspaper.” To these church audiences, I related my own learning experience, that of seeing hordes of U.S. correspondents covering a relatively tiny state. I pointed out that I had not seen so many reporters in world capitals such as Beijing, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris. Why, I asked, did a small state with a 1980 population of only four million warrant more reporters than China, with a billion people?
I also linked this query with my findings that The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post -- and most of our nation's print media - are owned and/or controlled by Jews supportive of Israel. It was for this reason, I deduced, that they sent so many reporters to cover Israel -- and to do so largely from the Israeli point of view.
My learning experiences also included coming to realize how easily I could lose a Jewish friend if I criticized the Jewish state. I could with impunity criticize France, England, Russia, even the United States. And any aspect of life in America. But not the Jewish state. I lost more Jewish friends than one after the publication of Journey to Jerusalem -- all sad losses for me and one, perhaps, saddest of all.
In the 1960s and 1970s, before going to the Middle East, I had written about the plight of blacks in a book entitled Soul Sister, and the plight of American Indians in a book entitled Bessie Yellowhair, and the problems endured by undocumented workers crossing from Mexico in The Illegals. These books had come to the attention of the “mother” of The New York Times, Mrs. Arthur Hays Sulzberger.
Her father had started the newspaper, then her husband ran it, and in the years that I knew her, her son was the publisher. She invited me to her fashionable apartment on Fifth Avenue for lunches and dinner parties. And, on many occasions, I was a weekend guest at her Greenwich, Conn., home.
She was liberal-minded and praised my efforts to speak for the underdog, even going so far in one letter to say, “You are the most remarkable woman I ever knew.” I had little concept that from being buoyed so high I could be dropped so suddenly when I discovered -- from her point of view -- the “wrong” underdog.
As it happened, I was a weekend guest in her spacious Connecticut home when she read bound galleys of Journey to Jerusalem. As I was leaving, she handed the galleys back with a saddened look: “My dear, have you forgotten the Holocaust?” She felt that what happened in Nazi Germany to Jews several decades earlier should silence any criticism of the Jewish state. She could focus on a holocaust of Jews while negating a modern day holocaust of Palestinians.
I realized, quite painfully, that our friendship was ending. Iphigene Sulzberger had not only invited me to her home to meet her famous friends but, also at her suggestion, The Times had requested articles. I wrote op-ed articles on various subjects including American blacks, American Indians as well as undocumented workers. Since Mrs. Sulzberger and other Jewish officials at the Times highly praised my efforts to help these groups of oppressed peoples, the dichotomy became apparent: most “liberal” U.S. Jews stand on the side of all poor and oppressed peoples save one -- the Palestinians.
How handily these liberal Jewish opinion-molders tend to diminish the Palestinians, to make them invisible, or to categorize them all as “terrorists.”
Interestingly, Iphigene Sulzberger had talked to me a great deal about her father, Adolph S. Ochs. She told me that he was not one of the early Zionists. He had not favored the creation of a Jewish state.
Yet, increasingly, American Jews have fallen victim to Zionism, a nationalistic movement that passes for many as a religion. While the ethical instructions of all great religions -- including the teachings of Moses, Muhammad and Christ -- stress that all human beings are equal, militant Zionists take the position that the killing of a non-Jew does not count.
Over five decades now, Zionists have killed Palestinians with impunity. And in the 1996 shelling of a U.N. base in Qana, Lebanon, the Israelis killed more than 100 civilians sheltered there. As an Israeli journalist, Arieh Shavit, explains of the massacre, “We believe with absolute certitude that right now, with the White House in our hands, the Senate in our hands and The New York Times in our hands, the lives of others do not count the same way as our own.”
Israelis today, explains the anti-Zionist Jew Israel Shahak, “are not basing their religion on the ethics of justice. They do not accept the Old Testament as it is written. Rather, religious Jews turn to the Talmud. For them, the Talmudic Jewish laws become “the Bible.” And the Talmud teaches that a Jew can kill a non-Jew with impunity.
In the teachings of Christ, there was a break from such Talmudic teachings. He sought to heal the wounded, to comfort the downtrodden.
The danger, of course, for U.S. Christians is that having made an icon of Israel, we fall into a trap of condoning whatever Israel does -- even wanton murder -- as orchestrated by God.
Yet, I am not alone in suggesting that the churches in the United States represent the last major organized support for Palestinian rights. This imperative is due in part to our historic links to the Land of Christ and in part to the moral issues involved with having our tax dollars fund Israeli-government-approved violations of human rights.
While Israel and its dedicated U.S. Jewish supporters know they have the president and most of Congress in their hands, they worry about grassroots America -- the well-meaning Christians who care for justice. Thus far, most Christians were unaware of what it was they didn't know about Israel. They were indoctrinated by U.S. supporters of Israel in their own country and when they traveled to the Land of Christ most all did so under Israeli sponsorship. That being the case, it was unlikely a Christian ever met a Palestinian or learned what caused the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
This is gradually changing, however. And this change disturbs the Israelis. As an example, delegates attending a Christian Sabeel conference in Bethlehem earlier this year said they were harassed by Israeli security at the Tel Aviv airport.
“They asked us,” said one delegate, “Why did you use a Palestinian travel agency? Why didn't you use an Israeli agency?” The interrogation was so extensive and hostile that Sabeel leaders called a special session to brief the delegates on how to handle the harassment. Obviously, said one delegate, “The Israelis have a policy to discourage us from visiting the Holy Land except under their sponsorship. They don't want Christians to start learning all they have never known about Israel.”



About the Author
Grace Halsell (1923-2000) was a distinguished American journalist, war correspondent, author and columnist. She was the author of 13 books, including Journey to Jerusalem and Prophecy and Politics.


#2021  11/2008
This essay, and others in this series, are available in handy leaflet format, ideal for wide distribution.
They can be ordered, postpaid, at these prices:
20 copies, $3.00 :: 50 copies, $7.00 :: 100 copies or more, 13 cents each
Institute for Historical Review
P.O. Box 2739
Newport Beach, CA 92659
USA
www.ihr.org
ihr@ihr.org


Biblical Quotes about Love


Mark 12:31:  The second is this: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' There is no commandment greater than these."

Luke 6:31:  Do to others as you would have them do to you.

Luke 6:35:  But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked.

John 8:13:  The Pharisees challenged him, "Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid."

Romans 12:9:  Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good.

Romans 13:10:  Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.

1 Corinthians 13:4-8:  Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.  It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.  Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.  It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.  Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away.

1 Corinthians 13:13:  And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.

Ephesians 4:2:  Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love.

1 Peter 4:8:  Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins.

1 John 4:7:  Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God.

1 John 4:18-19:  There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.  We love because he first loved us.

John 15:13:  Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends.

Ephesians 5:25:  Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her

Ephesians 5:33:  However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

Colossians 3:14:  And over all these virtues put on love, which binds them all together in perfect unity.

Proverbs 10:12:  Hatred stirs up dissension, but love covers over all wrongs.

Proverbs 17:17:  A friend loves at all times, and a brother is born for adversity.

1 John 3:16-18:  This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers.  If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him?  Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth.

1 John 4:8:  Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.

John 3:16:  "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

Psalm 18:1:  I love you, O LORD, my strength.

Matthew 22:27-29:  Finally, the woman died.  Now then, at the resurrection, whose wife will she be of the seven, since all of them were married to her?"  Jesus replied, "You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God.

Deuteronomy 10:12-19:  And now, O Israel, what does the LORD your God ask of you but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in all his ways, to love him, to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and to observe the LORD's commands and decrees that I am giving you today for your own good?  To the LORD your God belong the heavens, even the highest heavens, the earth and everything in it.  Yet the LORD set his affection on your forefathers and loved them, and he chose you, their descendants, above all the nations, as it is today.  Circumcise your hearts, therefore, and do not be stiff-necked any longer.  For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who shows no partiality and accepts no bribes.  He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the alien, giving him food and clothing.  And you are to love those who are aliens, for you yourselves were aliens in Egypt.

Deuteronomy 11:13-22:  So if you faithfully obey the commands I am giving you today--to love the LORD your God and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul--  then I will send rain on your land in its season, both autumn and spring rains, so that you may gather in your grain, new wine and oil.  I will provide grass in the fields for your cattle, and you will eat and be satisfied.  Be careful, or you will be enticed to turn away and worship other gods and bow down to them.  Then the LORD's anger will burn against you, and he will shut the heavens so that it will not rain and the ground will yield no produce, and you will soon perish from the good land the LORD is giving you.  Fix these words of mine in your hearts and minds; tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads.  Teach them to your children, talking about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.  Write them on the doorframes of your houses and on your gates,  so that your days and the days of your children may be many in the land that the LORD swore to give your forefathers, as many as the days that the heavens are above the earth.  If you carefully observe all these commands I am giving you to follow--to love the LORD your God, to walk in all his ways and to hold fast to him--

Song of Solomon 8:4-8:  Daughters of Jerusalem, I charge you: Do not arouse or awaken love until it so desires.  Who is this coming up from the desert leaning on her lover? Under the apple tree I roused you; there your mother conceived you, there she who was in labor gave you birth.  Place me like a seal over your heart, like a seal on your arm; for love is as strong as death, its jealousy unyielding as the grave. It burns like blazing fire, like a mighty flame.  Many waters cannot quench love; rivers cannot wash it away. If one were to give all the wealth of his house for love, it would be utterly scorned.  We have a young sister, and her breasts are not yet grown. What shall we do for our sister for the day she is spoken for?

Matthew 6:24:  "No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money.

Matthew 22:37-39:  Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'  This is the first and greatest commandment.  And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'


Matthew 23:6-8:  they love the place of honor at banquets and the most important seats in the synagogues; they love to be greeted in the marketplaces and to have men call them 'Rabbi.'  "But you are not to be called 'Rabbi,' for you have only one Master and you are all brothers.

Thoughts this Sunday morning


"We should have respect for animals because it makes better human beings of us all." - Dr. Jane Goodall #weeklyquote

As I read these words by Dr. Jane Goodall, another of many truisms on Facebook, I'm faced with the facts that we should do a lot of these things to make us better human beings, or make it a better world... but do these people who DO NOT do THESE THINGS which are advocated, read these words?

Maybe we should print these truisms out as leaflets and drop them all over the world, especially where fighting takes place... although, it should read, respect for all humans too.

I can picture little drones flying around the world with little sacks hanging from their little wheels. LOOK OUT BELOW!

Good luck little words!

July 21, 2014

Reading the “Meet The Press” bashing party

Visiting the facebook page, after watching this Sunday morning program, I’m introduced to a whole new set of people and their opinions; not the best in the world.


Everyone appears to be wanting to toss David Gregory, the host and moderator, to the curb.  I haven’t quite figured out the underlying momentum of their animosity, other than they don’t feel he leans enough to the left, and tends to be too soft with the right while interviewing the republican guests.  I tend to wonder if Gregory is purposefully allowing the republicans to voice their opinions, without controversy and undue interruption, so as to show the public just how ridiculous they sound...has anyone thought of that?


Then these posters go way off the subject of the headlines and royally bash President Obama.  Talk about venting spleens!
I love President Obama, I love his intellectualism, not racing into battle the way the republicans tend to want to do, but at times I feel as though it's learn as you go ‘out loud’ and he’s making us walk through his deliberate sludge, listening to him speak.   

I tend to look for answers in speeches, not hypothetical conclusions.  I'm looking for goals, whether short or long, something that gives hope, not theoretical sanctions. And what can WE do to move this along in the direction most rewarding for everyone, without bashing him for answers.  

These people’s voice, like so many on facebook, can be a nuisance and/or an angry mob.  No serious discussions will ever occur with this attitude.  I’m floundering, like I think so many people are these days. Attitude seems to be the topic of everything we do these days, and the bottom line, the crux, is we need our President to help us do some adjusting.



I Am a Liberal

This sums up my beliefs.  I am not the original writer of this, although I have altered some words.  Ins tead of using the reference to “...